preferred for crude cell supernatant rich in high biomass content, due to their higher
capacity to retain impurities within the filter. Their mode of operation is not only
based on size exclusion, but also hydrophobic and electrostatic interactions. Some
filter aids can be added to depth filters, such as diatomaceous earth (DE), that
revealed to improve the filter efficiency in retaining particles [26]. Depth filters play
mainly with two factors for particle retention: size exclusion and adsorption. Some
filters, such as Sartopure® PP3, stand out given their very low unspecific binding.
This allows retaining most of cells and cells debris [27].
On the other hand, microfiltration membranes using TFF retain only impurities
larger than the pore size and have a lower impurity holding capacity. They are,
therefore, suitable for a secondary clarification step. Both kinds of clarification filters
(depth filters and membrane devices) are suitable for scale-up in vaccine manu-
facturing and both have already been incorporated in the manufacturing processes of
viral vaccines [28–30]. Generally, clarification is a complex step with a number of
available technologies. As presented in Table 7.1, there is no universal solution since
the selection of the filters and operation parameters requires critical handling.
As discussed previously, it is of importance to wisely select the TOH, as, it can
strongly impact clarification step. Indeed, harvesting cell cultures with low cell
viability increase the presence of cell debris in the extracellular medium thus re-
ducing filter capacity and further blockage. To assess the clarification process ef-
ficiency, solution turbidy monitoring is an important parameter. It also enables the
detection of the filter capacity which is related to the fouling of the membrane [38].
Membrane fouling is commonly the consequence of the formation of a polarized
layer on the filter surface due to impurities’ accumulation present in the cell su-
pernatant. Operating membrane microfiltration through tangential flow filtration
(TFF) allows avoiding such formation of the polarized layer since the cross-flow
decreases the formation of a “cake” on the membrane surface.
Membrane devices such as hollow fibers or cassettes can be used for the clar-
ification step using TFF. However, the latest upstream technologies advances
(Chapter 5), especially the high cell densities processes, are challenging such fil-
tration operations. In the last decade, several virus’s production systems have been
described to produce at cell densities above 107 cell/ml, namely PER.C6 cell line
grown up to 108 cell/mL for HIV vaccine candidate [39]; MDCK cells infected with
the influenza virus at 5 × 107 cell/ml [40] and, more recently, CR.pIX cells reaching
2.5 × 107 cells/mL for modified vaccinia Ankara production [41]. All of these
productions employed an advanced alternating tangential flow (ATF) perfusion
system, using a hollow-fiber device. Another filtration technology widely applied to
high-cell densities is body feed filtration (BFF). Here few filter aids are added to the
crude bulk, such as diatomaceous earth (DE), to enhance the filter capacity [42].
Another novel technology of Repligen for fed-batch clarification is TFDF™, which
combines benefits of tangential flow (TF) and depth filtration (DF) in a single-use
system with pore size ranging from 2 to 5 μm. This system was successfully applied
to separate lentiviral vectors from cell debris in batch and perfusion production
modes [43].
During vaccine manufacturing, there is an extra concern with host-cell DNA
removal depending on a risk assessment to evaluate possible side effects with the
182
Bioprocessing of Viral Vaccines